As companies throughout the U.S. are hurrying to incorporate artificial intelligence, a major change is happening in the background. Automation is viewed as the next important stage in the evolution of business and it is being celebrated. However, AI is being used faster and more accurately than ever before but at the same time, many leaders are now warning that it is one of the most significant factors which gets ignored—the humans who are doing the job.
With the help of tools that could instantly write, analyze, generate and respond, to the question that how much can we automate companies are easily tempted to ask. But a better question to follow up here is: What if we automatically automate too much?
RelatedPosts
Businesses Ask a Wrong Question
Among all executive sessions and companies’ boardrooms, the idea of reducing headcount and at the same time increasing automation is repeatedly mentioned as the main one to follow. The line of thinking seems understandable like if one tool can do the job of five people, then why not use fewer employees and hence scale faster?
However, this kind of reasoning is very often leading to one of the most typical mistakes made: AI is treated as a substitute and not a partner. This way, the very idea would not function only to get people away and but it might infringe on the innovation of the company.
Factually speaking, this is not the thing only for which AI can be helpful. But it is about identifying the area of work in which both AI and HR can be more productive, and how to design this work in such a way that it can be beneficial for both.
Automation with no Strategy Leads to Mediocrity
AI has ceased being a secret tool. The use of models, APIs, and machine learning platforms which are practically available in every company nowadays ranging from a startup to a globally-known one simply confirms the above. Now, the competitive edge does not stem from the technology itself.
The difference between the two firms lies in the way they use those tools if two companies use the same one. And this is completely up to individuals.
Your edge doesn’t just refer to products that are processed quicker. It is about creativity – the ability to make judgments and strategy. The development of these things does not come from code; it emerges from your team’s way of thinking, acting, and leading.
The Real Role of Humans in the Age of AI
At work, we need to change the way humans and AI interact and start coexisting in a different way. An out-of-date mentality set in stone about “keeping a human in the loop” suggests that humans only appear to authorize what the system does. Yet it is the change that is deeply occurring now that is so much bigger.
Not only do we not need people in the loop, but we also need people at the wheel.
This is about giving the workers the opportunity to pilot the way AI is used, to voice their dissatisfaction with the outputs when necessary and apply their skills to influence AI decisions.
To make this transition possible, we must train our professionals across sectors, including finance and healthcare, to not only accommodate AI but to support it too.
When You Cut Too Deep, Innovation Suffers
Human-centered companies have always relied on one thing that machines can’t- originality. Both new ideas and problem-solving under pressure, as well as unexpected insights, are often generated by emotional tensions, collaboration, conflict, etc.
If you strip away a majority of that, what you get isn’t efficiency- it’s creative silence.
When AI becomes the lone producer of results, the teams decide not to ask questions anymore. They no longer challenge the assumptions. And indeed, this is the time the business ceases growing.
Responsibility Still Belongs to People
Because AI is becoming a more decisive component in the decision-making process, the potential for mistakes and wrong assumptions increases. Machines have no understanding of ethics, no ability to recognize cultural sensitivity, and, lastly, no way of perceiving public opinion.
Reputational damage can only be identified by humans before it happens. Deciding about recognizing an automated result that is technically true but ethically wrong is something that only people can do.
That is why human leadership has become necessary. This is especially true for the sectors where the whole business is based on trust and the way a brand thinks of itself.
Shaping the Future of Work, Together
Dont understand this as a call to dismiss AI. The reality is quite the opposite: businesses that are most successful today are those that adopt AI intentionally and not without thought. They do not lay off employees just to cut operation costs. The management supports the team in finding out their new potentials and leads the way to adapt and, through this, also create economic value.
When employees no longer feel that they are just the subservient staff to a machine because the company has repeatedly stressed it and it is also exemplified through the management, they become re-engaged. They also grow as time goes on. They also lead.
That’s how real innovation comes about, not from automation alone, but from people who understand what is the right and the wrong time to use it and who go beyond it.
The companies that will be most successful in the age of artificial intelligence are not those with the greatest level of automation. It will be those who also understand most clearly what only human can accomplish.
The advantage will no longer be speed or scale in the time to come. It is going to be the human clarity, inventiveness, and the still shared control in a world where machines are indeed part of the team but are never in charge of the mission.
